June 25, 2024
Election Security: Standing up to Intimidation, Preventing Overt Attacks
Download the Resources:
We have seen, and fear we will see again, overt security events: intentional efforts and opportunistic attempts to use an intimidating presence, lodged threats and even violence to influence and alter election procedures and outcomes.
Potential threats exist across a continuum. An angry individual or distrustful observer could disrupt election activities. A group could arrive at an election facility without disruptive intentions. Anxious, misinformed cynicism from electors at a voting facility can channel rumor, innuendo, misunderstanding and anger, generating a mob mentality. More intentional groups, ranging from supporters of a candidate to self-styled militia and other extremist groups, may also attempt to gain influence over processing or voting facilities and procedures. The impact of intimidation at a voting site may be local and involve lower numbers, but ripples of news and gossip can spread fear in the broader community. A strong and immediate response can help calm concerns and limit the damage.
Similar resources:
Communications
Standards of Conduct for Election Workers
Standards of conduct set expectations for participant and observer behavior in normal election operations.
Jun 15, 2022
Security
Running Secure Elections with Confidence: Ensuring Physical Safety for Election Personnel
So much focus in the past several years has been on security in elections. The potential of cybersecurity attacks shutting down sectors of government helped to stimulate the elections community […]
Jun 25, 2024
Communications
Election Observer Resources
Meaningful observation is essential to the health of the election process. The guides on this page are designed as handouts for election observers.
Feb 28, 2024